Cabin & Comfort
A more comfortable, upscale place to spend your drive, supported by leather seats.

Before you compare
EX-L AWD vs SL, compared on verified specifications and price.
The EX-L AWD and SL are closely matched on price: $46,795 vs $46,760.
Because these two trims sit at different points in their lineups, the category winners below reflect trim level as much as brand. Read them as evidence, and weigh them against the equipment you will actually use.
At a glance
For shoppers on this Pilot site, the Pilot EX-L AWD is our pick over the Murano SL.
Close call — closely matched on price: $46,795 vs $46,760.
Pilot EX-L AWD makes 285 hp vs 241 hp.
Murano SL returns 23 mpg combined vs 21 mpg.
Head to head
The verified differences most likely to decide it — each shown side by side, with the winner called out.
A more comfortable, upscale place to spend your drive, supported by leather seats.
The Murano SL delivers lower fuel costs and fewer stops at the pump.
Closely matched: $46,795 vs $46,760.
The Pilot EX-L AWD makes everyday hauling and road trips easier with more cargo room.
The Pilot EX-L AWD gives you stronger acceleration and easier passing.
The EX-L AWD and SL are closely matched on price: $46,795 vs $46,760.
On verified numbers, the EX-L AWD leads in horsepower and cargo volume; the SL leads in combined mpg. What the numbers actually mean for you here: the SL's combined mpg edge (23 vs 21 mpg) means fewer stops at the pump and lower running costs over years of ownership, the EX-L AWD's horsepower edge (285 vs 241 hp) shows up most when merging and passing rather than in daily commuting, and the EX-L AWD's cargo volume edge (87 vs 63.5 cu ft) is what decides how it handles road trips, gear, and family duty.
When it matters most: if your commute is long, the SL's combined mpg edge (23 vs 21 mpg) is worth weighting heavily; if you regularly carry more than a passenger or two of gear, the EX-L AWD's cargo volume edge (87 vs 63.5 cu ft) may decide it.
Visual comparison


Pilot EX-L AWD
Murano SL

Pilot EX-L AWD







Murano SL







The bottom line
Pilot EX-L AWD
For shoppers on this Pilot site, the Pilot EX-L AWD is our pick over the Murano SL.
What could change this: If better fuel economy and lower running costs matters most, the Murano SL is the better fit.
On verified numbers, the EX-L AWD leads in horsepower and cargo volume; the SL leads in combined mpg.
The full picture
By the numbers
These are the figures most shoppers weigh first — price, power, efficiency, and room — with the full specification table below.
| Specification | Pilot EX-L AWD | Murano SL |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | $46,795 | $46,760 |
| Horsepower | 285 hp | 241 hp |
| Torque | 262 lb-ft | 260 lb-ft |
| Combined MPG | 21 mpg | 23 mpg |
| City MPG | 19 mpg | 21 mpg |
| Highway MPG | 25 mpg | 27 mpg |
| Max cargo — behind 1st row, seats folded | 87 cu ft | 63.5 cu ft |
| Seating | 8 | 5 |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | 10-Speed Automatic | 9-Speed Automatic |
Make the call
Best for:
Best for:
Good to know
The questions shoppers ask most when weighing these two — answered with the verified facts.
Value comes down to the details. The EX-L AWD and SL are closely matched on price: $46,795 vs $46,760. Weigh the standard equipment each includes, their fuel economy, and the features you'll genuinely use. Cross-shop comparably equipped trims and let local incentives settle it.
"Nicer every day" is about the things you touch on every drive — the seats, the controls, and the screen. Comfort is personal, though: seat shape, driving position, and how intuitive the controls feel to you matter more than any feature list. Spend ten minutes in each on a route like your real commute — that test drive will tell you more about daily livability than any spec comparison.
Yes — a few things worth knowing before you decide. The Murano SL brings stronger fuel economy that the Pilot EX-L AWD doesn't match in this pairing. None of these automatically make it the better car for you, but if any one lines up with how you drive, it's a genuine reason to give the SL a serious look. Weigh those advantages against where the EX-L AWD leads — and the verdict above — rather than treating any single feature as the whole decision.
High annual mileage puts the spotlight on running costs, and that's mostly about fuel. Here, the Murano SL returns the better EPA-estimated economy (23 mpg combined) — over 15,000 miles a year that adds up to noticeably fewer fill-ups and real money saved versus the alternative. Beyond fuel, a high-mileage driver should weigh seat comfort for all those hours and each model's reliability record — worth checking current ratings for the specific trims, since it matters most when you're piling on miles. If your year is mostly highway commuting, lean toward the more efficient, more comfortable choice; the small differences compound over 15,000 miles in a way they wouldn't for a light-use second car.
On space, expect more cargo room in the Pilot EX-L AWD. Interior preference is partly personal — dashboard layout, seat shape, and where the controls fall all factor in — so the best test is to sit in both. If a richer, more feature-laden cabin matters to you, compare the specific trims' option packages directly; if you mainly want a comfortable, sensibly-arranged space, either will serve you well day to day.
For most shoppers, the right pick follows your priorities rather than a single score. If running costs lead, the Murano SL's efficiency is the draw. Use the verdict above as the starting recommendation, then confirm it with a back-to-back test drive of the exact trims you're considering.
Find local inventory, pricing, incentives, and available trims near you.
Updated inventory from local dealers.